GermGuardian AC4825 Vs Blueair 411 – Pure Minimalism!

I compared two almost identical air purifiers in terms of specifications: the GermGuardian AC4825 and Blueair 411. There is only one winner!

The GermGuardian AC4825 and Blueair Blue Pure 411 are huge competitors and are frequently compared by customers.

Both devices feature a minimalist design and lack advanced features. However, this hasn’t stopped the AC4825 from becoming one of Guardian Technology’s best-selling models. Meanwhile,

Blueair is well-known for its innovative design and unique washable pre-filter.

The GermGuardian AC4825 is intended for rooms up to 167 sq. ft. (15.5 m²), whereas the Blue Pure 411 is suitable for spaces up to 161 sq. ft. (15 m²).

We’ve analyzed their specifications, performance, odor-neutralization capabilities, noise levels, and power consumption to determine which one offers the better value for the money.

Our Verdict

GermGuardian AC4825 Vs Blueair 411 - Hands-on Comparison
Photo: Airpurifierfirst.com / Milan Antonic

The GermGuardian AC4825 and Blueair 411 are nearly identical in terms of specifications, particularly when comparing their CADR values.

After analyzing the specifications, reviewing the test results, and performing detailed tests on both air purifiers, I chose the Blueair 411 as the better buying option.

It’s more affordable to maintain, performs better at capturing airborne particles, achieves superior results in our smoke test, and features a washable pre-filter.

The only drawback of the Blueair 411, compared to the GermGuardian, is that it doesn’t use a True HEPA filter, whereas the GermGuardian does.

If you have any questions about these two air purifiers, feel free to ask them in the comment section below the article.

Video Comparison

Specs: GermGuardian AC4825 Vs Blueair 411

Product ImageGermGuardian AC4825(E)Blueair 411
ManufacturerGuardian TechnologiesBlueair
ModelAC4825(E)Blue Pure 411
Dimensions (inches / cm)9 x 5.5 x 22 inches (22.9 x 14 x 55.9 cm)16.7 x 7.8 x 7.8 inches (42.5 x 20 x 20 cm)
Weight (pounds / kg)8.5 lb (3.86 kg)3.35 lb (1.52 kg)
Clean Air Delivery Rate (CADR)99 CFM (168 m³/h)105 CFM (180 m³/h)
Coverage (4.8 ACH) 167 sq. ft. (15.5 m²)161 sq. ft. (15 m²)
Performance Ratings
Filtration TechnologyPre/Charcoal Filter Combo, True HEPA Filter, and UV-C LightWashable Pre-filter, Particle Filter, and Carbon Filter
Filter Replacement IndicatorYesYes
Filter Lifeup to 6 months (HEPA)6-8 months
Power Consumption 55W10W
Operating Costs Ratings
Number of Fan Speeds3 – Low, Medium, and High3 – Speed 1, Speed 2, and Speed 3
Air Quality Sensor NoNo
Air Quality IndicatorNoNo
Auto Mode NoNo
Smart App NoNo
Voice Control NoNo
Other FeaturesUV-C LightSmart Plug
Noise Level (low – high)46.7 – 54.2 dBA40.6 – 67.5 dBA
Noise Ratings
Best Suited For
Small Spaces
Mold
Bedrooms
Allergies
Small Spaces
Dust
Low Energy Cost
Warranty3-year2-year
In-Depth ReviewGuardian Technologies AC4825(E)Blueair Blue Pure 411
PriceCheck Price on AmazonCheck Price on Amazon

Performance Test – Comparison

I love comparing air purifiers with the same or similar CADRs, and these two models are just like that.

The GermGuardian AC4825 has a CADR of 99 CFM (168 m³/h), while the Blueair 411 boasts a slightly higher CADR of 105 CFM (180 m³/h).

GermGuardian AC4825 Vs Blueair 411 - Performance Tests
GermGuardian AC4825 Vs Blueair 411 – Performance tests. Photo: Airpurifierfirst.com / Milan Antonic

To test their efficiency in removing airborne particles, we placed them in two rooms of identical sizes according to their recommended coverage.

In the first test, performed in a 194 sq. ft. (18 m²) room, both air purifiers delivered outstanding results. The GermGuardian improved air quality by 92%, while the Blueair 411 achieved a 95% improvement. Both devices operated at maximum speed for 60 minutes.

Particle Removal Tests - Comparison

We placed the GermGuardian AC4825 Vs Blueair 411 in two separate tests and measured their performance using the Temtop laser particle meter.

In the second test, performed in a larger 320 sq. ft. (30 m²) room, which is well beyond the recommended size for both air purifiers, they also produced impressive results. Both models improved air quality by 90%.

It’s important to note that we didn’t use the GermGuardian’s UV-C light feature during these tests. While this feature might have marginally improved its performance, I believe the difference wouldn’t have been significant enough to change the test results.

Overall, we can conclude that the Blueair 411 performed slightly better in these tests.

Smoke Box Test – Comparison

Although their CADR ratings are nearly identical, their performance in the smoke test was different.

In addition to similar CADR ratings, both models use fibrous filters coated with carbon.

GermGuardian AC4825 Vs Blueair 411 - Smoke Test
GermGuardian AC4825 Vs Blueair 411 – Smoke test. Photo (GIF): Airpurifierfirst.com / Milan Antonic

The GermGuardian AC4825 took 38 seconds to remove all the smoke from the glass box, whereas the Blueair 411 accomplished the same task in an impressive 20 seconds.

I believe there’s little room for debate in this case—it’s clear that the Blueair 411 delivered a superior result.

Noise Level Test – Comparison

What I don’t like about these two air purifiers is the lack of a sleep mode.

I particularly miss this feature on the GermGuardian model because its noise level at the lowest speed is much higher than the Blueair’s.

GermGuardian AC4825 Vs Blueair 411 - Noise test
GermGuardian AC4825 Vs Blueair 411 – Noise test. Photo: Airpurifierfirst.com / Milan Antonic

The GermGuardian produces a sound level of 46.7 dBA, whereas the Blueair 411 operates at a quieter 40.6 dBA at its lowest speed. At this speed, the Blueair 411 is quieter than some similar air purifiers in sleep mode.

Noise Levels - Comparison

Comparison of noise levels at all fan speeds between the GermGuardian AC4825 Vs Blueair 411 air purifiers.

However, the situation changes at maximum speed. The GermGuardian AC4825 produces a sound of 54.2 dBA, while the Blueair 411 is much louder; it produces a sound of 67.5 dBA.

Although the GermGuardian is noisier at its lowest speed, it is far better optimized for noise at maximum speed while maintaining an almost identical CADR to the Blueair 411.

Fan Speed GermGuardian AC4825(E) (dBA)Blueair 411 (dBA)
Speed 1 (Low)46.7 dBA40.6 dBA
Speed 2 (Medium)50.5 dBA54.5 dBA
Speed 3 (High)54.2 dBA67.5 dBA

For this reason, I would say the GermGuardian offers better noise optimization overall.

Operating Costs – Comparison

The GermGuardian AC4825 uses a 55W motor, but it’s worth noting that the UV-C light alone consumes about 5W.

In contrast, the Blueair 411 is equipped with a highly optimized 10W motor. Honestly, I was amazed by the performance this air purifier delivers, given its low-power motor.

GermGuardian AC4825 Vs Blueair 411 - Motor
Motors compared. Photo: Airpurifierfirst.com / Milan Antonic

If you run both air purifiers at maximum speed for 24 hours a day over a month, the GermGuardian AC4825 would increase your electricity bill by approximately $3.42, while the Blueair 411 would add only about $0.67.

Monthly Power Consumption Cost - Comparison

Comparison of monthly power consumption costs for the GermGuardian AC4825 Vs Blueair 411 air purifiers at all fan speeds.

Beyond the significant difference in power consumption, there’s also a notable disparity in filter replacement costs. The Blueair 411 stands out as the better option here as well, mostly because it has a much cheaper replacement filter.

Fan Speed GermGuardian AC4825(E) (W + $/month)Blueair 411 (W + $/month)
Standby0W ($0)0.3W ($0.03)
Speed 1 (Low)30.8W ($2.7)0.6W ($0.05)
Speed 2 (Medium)34.8W ($3.05)2.4W ($0.21)
Speed 3 (High)39W ($3.42)7.6W ($0.67)

Over a year, considering both power use and filter replacement costs, the GermGuardian AC4825 will cost you significantly more than the Blueair 411.

Features Overview

Both devices have some identical functions. Both of them have a filter reset indicator, which will let you know when the filter needs replacement. As well both of these lovely air purifiers use three speeds.

Controls

The GermGuardian AC4825 uses a hand-operated mechanical wheel to control fan speed. Below the mechanical wheel is the UV button used to turn the UV-C light on or off and reset the “filter reset indicator.”

The Blue Pure 411 uses a single button for complete device control. This button is used to control the fan speed and to reset the “filter reset indicator.”

GermGuardian AC4825 Vs Blueair 411 - Controls
Both GermGuardian and Blueair have a control button located on the top. Photo: Airpurifierfirst.com / Milan Antonic

Device control is equal on both devices. The difference is that the AC4825 uses a mechanical wheel, and the Blue Pure 411 uses a single button. GermGuardian can also be used via a smart plug.

UV-C Light

The GermGuardian AC4825 uses a 5W UV-C light bulb. This light helps against germs. The downside of this light is the location. It is located on the upper side of the device, so the air is not kept long enough in front of the UV-C light, and the full potential is not applied. It would be better if the UV-C is placed someplace in the center of the device.

Personalized Pre-Filters

The Blue Pure 411 offers the ability to personalize pre-filters. It is possible to pick one of the suggested colors: Dark Shadow, Diva Blue, Buff Yellow, Crystal Pink, or Lunar Rock.

Airflow

The GermGuardian AC4825 and Blue Pure 411 are tower air purifiers. However, the airflow of the device is different.

With the GermGuardian AC4825, air enters from the rear, after which it is filtered through a pre-filter, carbon filter, and True HEPA filter. Part of the air comes in contact with the UV-C bulb. The filtered air exits through the grilles on the front of the device.

GermGuardian AC4825 Vs Blue Pure 411 - Review comparison
I placed the GermGuardian AC4825 and Blueair 411 side-by-side. Photo: Airpurifierfirst.com / Milan Antonic

With the Blue Pure 411, the air inlet is located on the unit’s bottom, occupying two-thirds of the device. Air enters from all sides. The opening is 360 degrees wide. The air is filtered through a pre-filter, then through a True HEPA filter, and finally through a carbon filter. After that, air comes out on the upper side of the device.

Blueair 411 Vs Levoit Core 300 Winix 5500-2 Vs Blueair 411 GermGuardian AC4825 Vs Winix 5500-2 GermGuardian AC4825 Vs Levoit LV-H132 GermGuardian AC4825 Vs Levoit Core 300 Related comparisons

Filtration Technology

The GermGuardian AC4825 uses 4-in-1 filtration, with the primary filter being a True HEPA filter. The first stage of filtration is pre-filter. The second stage is the charcoal filter. The third stage is the True HEPA filter. The final stage of filtration is UV-C Bulb.

The Blue Pure 411 uses a HEPA filter, not a True HEPA. Blue Pure 411 uses 3-in-1 filtration. The first stage of filtration is a pre-filter, the second stage is the HEPA filter, and the third stage is a carbon filter. The Blueair 411 filter is bigger than the filter at GermGuardian. Both devices use a fibrous filter covered with carbon.

GermGuardian AC4825 Vs Blue Pure 411 - Filters
In the image above, you can see these two air purifiers disassembled. Photo: Airpurifierfirst.com / Milan Antonic

The GermGuardian AC4825 uses an additional filtration stage, UV-C light. UV-C light destroys germs and mold spores. Both devices have a filter reset indicator that will notify the user when it is time to replace the filter.

How to Replace Filters?

With both devices, the filter replacement is needed on average between every 6-8 months. With the GermGuardian AC4825, the light bulb change is required on average every 12 months.

How to replace GermGuardian AC4825 filter? How to replace Blue Pure 411 filter? Filter replacement

You Can Also Watch Our Video Reviews:

GermGuardian AC4825 – Video Review

Blueair 411 – Video Review

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *