Levoit produces some of the best air purifiers on the market, and I have tested almost all of them. Winix, on the other hand, stands side by side with Levoit in terms of market position.
In this article, I will compare the Levoit EverestAir and the Winix 5510 air purifiers.
Yes, the Levoit EverestAir is a much larger, more powerful, and more modern air purifier, but is that enough to outperform the Winix?
Both air purifiers feature three-stage filtration technology, with the Winix 5510 offering PlasmaWave as an additional stage. They also both support smart app control.
Our Verdict
Realistically speaking, the Levoit EverestAir and the Winix 5510 are two top-tier air purifiers. However, each model has its own advantages and disadvantages.
In my opinion, the Levoit EverestAir offers slightly more than the Winix.
It has a higher CADR, delivers somewhat better performance, and uses a much better smart app. These are the main reasons why I would choose it as the better purchase over the Winix.
If you have any questions about these two air purifiers, feel free to leave a comment in the comment section below the article.
Specs: Levoit EverestAir Vs Levoit Vital 200S
| Product Image |  |  |
| Manufacturer | Levoit | Winix |
| Model | EverestAir | 5510 |
| Dimensions (inches / cm) | 18.9 x 8.5 x 24.5 inches (48 x 21.6 x 62.2 cm) | 13.6 x 8.3 x 22.2 inches (34.6 x 21.1 x 56.4 cm) |
| Weight (pounds / kg) | 20.3 lb (9.2 kg) | 13.3 lb (6 kg) |
| Clean Air Delivery Rate (CADR) | 360 CFM (612 mÂł/h) | 253 CFM (430 mÂł/h) |
| Coverage (4.8 ACH)
Room Coverage Explanation: ACH is a measurement used in indoor air quality management to indicate how many times the air within a defined space is changed/moved through the filter media.
For more details, visit our ACH calculator tool. | 558 sq. ft. (52 m²) | 392 sq. ft. (36 m²) |
| Performance Ratings Performance Ratings Score Summary: 8.3 - Average Score (101 products) 9.9 - Best Score (1 products) 1 - Worst Score (1 products) We use the Temtop LKC-1000S laser particle meter to test the particle removal efficiency of every air purifier. It measures PM2.5 (µg/m3), PM10 (µg/m3), Particles (per/L), and HCHO (mg/m3) in the air, and also calculates the AQI. You can read more about our testing methodology here. | ||
| Filtration Technology | Washable pre-filter, Main Filter, and Activated Carbon Filter | Pre-filter, Activated Carbon Filter, True HEPA Filter, and PlasmaWave |
| Filter Replacement Indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Filter Life | 12-15 months | up to 12 months |
| Power Consumption
Power Usage Summary: Our extensive testing of 101 air purifiers revealed the following power consumption insights:
Check out our power consumption calculator tool. | 70W | 65W |
| Operating Costs Ratings Operating Costs Ratings Score Summary: 8.9 - Average Score (101 products) 10 - Best Score (2 products) 1.7 - Worst Score (1 products) We measure the power usage at all speeds using an energy meter, after which we calculate how much it would cost to use the device at a particular fan speed for one month. For reference, we use an energy price of $0.12 per kWh. You can read more about our testing methodology here. | ||
| Number of Fan Speeds | 5 - Sleep Mode, Speed 1, Speed 2, Speed 3, and Turbo Mode | 5 - Sleep Mode, Speed 1, Speed 2, Speed 3, and Speed 4 |
| Air Quality Sensor Air Quality Sensor Summary: Out of 101 air purifiers tested, only 51 have the air quality sensor. | Yes | Yes |
| Air Quality Indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Mode Auto Mode Summary: Out of 101 air purifiers tested, only 52 have auto mode functionality. | Yes | Yes |
| Smart App Smart App Summary: Out of 101 air purifiers tested, only 30 have smart app functionality. | Yes | Yes |
| Voice Control Voice Control Summary: Out of 101 air purifiers tested, only 29 have voice control functionality. | Yes | Yes |
| Other Features | Wheels | PlasmaWaveLight Sensor |
| Noise Level (low – high) | 40.1 – 63.2 dBA | 40.2 – 65.7 dBA |
| Noise Ratings Noise Ratings Score Summary: 9.2 - Average Score (101 products) 10 - Best Score (1 products) 7.6 - Worst Score (1 products) We use a special noise measurement tool to test the noise level of the air purifier at all speeds. We measured the noise level on the dBA scale. You can read more about our testing methodology here. | ||
| Best Suited For | Pets Living Rooms Offices Allergies Large Spaces Dust Smart Home Integration | Pets Living Rooms Kitchens Allergies Smoke Dust Neutralizing VOCs |
| Warranty | 2-year | 2-year |
| In-Depth Review | Levoit EverestAir | Winix 5510 |
| Price |
Performance Test – Comparison
The Levoit EverestAir has a CADR of 360 CFM (612 m³/h), making it suitable for spaces of up to 558 sq. ft. (52 m²).
On the other hand, the Winix 5510 has a CADR of 253 CFM (430 m³/h) and is best suited for rooms of up to 392 sq. ft. (36 m²).
We tested their airborne particle removal performance using a Temtop laser particle meter.
Particle Removal Tests - Comparison
We placed the Levoit EverestAir and Winix 5510 in two separate tests and measured their performance using the Temtop laser particle meter.
Since these two air purifiers have different CADR ratings, we tested them in rooms of different sizes. In the first test, performed in a 560 sq. ft. (52 m²) room, the Levoit EverestAir improved air quality by about 96%, which is an outstanding result.
In the second test, we placed the Winix 5510 in a 320 sq. ft. (30 m²) room, where it also improved air quality by approximately 96%.
Although both devices achieved the same level of improvement, testing the Levoit EverestAir in a significantly larger room highlights its higher overall efficiency and stronger ability to capture airborne particles.
When it comes to odor removal, both air purifiers performed almost identically.
Noise Level Test – Comparison
Both air purifiers come with five fan speeds and include an auto mode.
We tested their noise levels using a specialized sound level meter.
The results were very similar, almost identical. You can see this clearly in the chart and table.
Noise Levels - Comparison
Comparison of noise levels at all fan speeds between the Levoit EverestAir and Winix 5510 air purifiers.
At the lowest speed, the Levoit EverestAir produces 40.1 dBA, while the Winix 5510 measures 40.2 dBA.
At maximum speed, the EverestAir produces 63.2 dBA, compared to 65.7 dBA produced by the Winix.
| Fan Speed | Levoit EverestAir (dBA) | Winix 5510 (dBA) |
|---|---|---|
| Sleep Mode | 40.1 dBA | 40.2 dBA |
| Speed 1 (Low) | 41.2 dBA | 41.5 dBA |
| Speed 2 (Medium) | 46.5 dBA | 43.2 dBA |
| Speed 3 (High) | 53.3 dBA | 52.7 dBA |
| Speed 4 (Turbo) | 63.2 dBA | 65.7 dBA |
Although the Winix performed slightly better in absolute noise measurements, the Levoit EverestAir offers a significantly better CADR-to-noise ratio. This makes it overall better optimized for noise efficiency than the Winix.
Operating Costs – Comparison
When it comes to power consumption, the first thing to note is that both air purifiers use relatively large motors.
The Levoit EverestAir is equipped with a 70W motor, while the Winix 5510 uses a 65W motor.
If you were to run both units at their maximum speeds for 24 hours a day over the course of one month, your electricity bill would increase by approximately $5.34 with the Levoit and about $4.68 with the Winix.
Monthly Power Consumption Cost - Comparison
Comparison of monthly power consumption costs for the Levoit EverestAir and Winix 5510 air purifiers at all fan speeds.
In addition to electricity costs, there is also the cost of replacement filters. The Levoit EverestAir filters typically need to be replaced every 12 to 15 months, while the Winix 5510 filters generally require replacement about once per year.
| Fan Speed | Levoit EverestAir (W + $/month) | Winix 5510 (W + $/month) |
|---|---|---|
| Standby | 1.6W ($0.14) | 1.1W ($0.01) |
| Sleep Mode | 4.8W ($0.42) | 3.7W ($0.32) |
| Speed 1 (Low) | 9.3W ($0.82) | 4.1W ($0.36) |
| Speed 2 (Medium) | 13.9W ($1.22) | 7.2W ($0.63) |
| Speed 3 (High) | 23W ($2.02) | 16.3W ($1.43) |
| Speed 4 (Turbo) | 60.9W ($5.34) | 53.4W ($4.68) |
Considering that replacement filters for the Winix are significantly more affordable and that it consumes slightly less energy, it is reasonable to conclude that the Winix 5510 is the more cost-effective option for annual maintenance.
Leave a Reply