I published a review of the Fulminare P05 a few months ago, and since then, I received a few messages asking how it compares to the Blueair Mini Max.
So, in this article, I will compare their performance, noise levels, specifications, and power consumption.
Neither of these air purifiers includes smart features, and both have small CADRs, but according to the manufacturers’ data, the Fulminare P05’s CADR is higher.
Their design principles are almost identical. However, the Blueair Mini Max features a washable pre-filter, superior build quality, and a more modern design.
Our Verdict
I think the choice is pretty clear—just by looking at the specifications, it’s evident that the Blueair Mini Max is the better buying option.
It offers superior performance, uses a higher-quality, longer-lasting filter, and features a washable pre-filter. Additionally, it comes from a trusted and reliable brand and has better build quality.
If you have any questions about these two air purifiers, feel free to ask in the comment section below the article.
Specs: Fulminare P05 Vs Blueair Mini Max
| Product Image |  |  |
| Manufacturer | Fulminare | Blueair |
| Model | P05 | Mini Max |
| Dimensions (inches / cm) | 5.71 x 5.71 x 9.88 inches (14.5 x 14.5 x 25.1 cm) | 11.4 x 6.8 x 5.9 inches (29 x 17.2 x 15 cm) |
| Weight (pounds / kg) | 1.8 lb (0.8 kg) | 2.8 lb (1.3 kg) |
| Clean Air Delivery Rate (CADR) | 135 CFM (230 m³/h) | 60 CFM (102 m³/h) |
| Coverage (4.8 ACH)
Room Coverage Explanation: ACH is a measurement used in indoor air quality management to indicate how many times the air within a defined space is changed/moved through the filter media.
For more details, visit our ACH calculator tool. | 215 sq. ft. (20 m²) | 93 sq. ft. (9 m²) |
| Performance Ratings Performance Ratings Score Summary: 8.4 - Average Score (79 products) 9.8 - Best Score (2 products) 2.5 - Worst Score (2 products) We use the Temtop LKC-1000S laser particle meter to test the particle removal efficiency of every air purifier. It measures PM2.5 (µg/m3), PM10 (µg/m3), Particles (per/L), and HCHO (mg/m3) in the air, and also calculates the AQI. You can read more about our testing methodology here. | ||
| Filtration Technology | Pre-filter, True HEPA Filter, and Activated Carbon Filter | Washable Pre-filter, Particle Filter, and Carbon Filter |
| Filter Replacement Indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Filter Life | 3-6 months | about 6 months |
| Power Consumption
Power Usage Summary: Our extensive testing of 79 air purifiers revealed the following power consumption insights:
Check out our power consumption calculator tool. | 6W | 10W |
| Operating Costs Ratings Operating Costs Ratings Score Summary: 9 - Average Score (79 products) 10 - Best Score (2 products) 1.7 - Worst Score (1 products) We measure the power usage at all speeds using an energy meter, after which we calculate how much it would cost to use the device at a particular fan speed for one month. For reference, we use an energy price of $0.12 per kWh. You can read more about our testing methodology here. | ||
| Number of Fan Speeds | 3 – Speed 1, Speed 2, and Speed 3 | 3 - Speed 1, Speed 2, and Speed 3 |
| Air Quality Sensor Air Quality Sensor Summary: Out of 79 air purifiers tested, only 39 have the air quality sensor. | No | No |
| Air Quality Indicator | No | No |
| Auto Mode Auto Mode Summary: Out of 79 air purifiers tested, only 40 have auto mode functionality. | No | No |
| Smart App Smart App Summary: Out of 79 air purifiers tested, only 25 have smart app functionality. | No | No |
| Voice Control Voice Control Summary: Out of 79 air purifiers tested, only 24 have voice control functionality. | No | No |
| Other Features | Night Light | Child Lock |
| Noise Level (low – high) | 41.1 – 51.6 dBA | 40.4 – 60.3 dBA |
| Noise Ratings Noise Ratings Score Summary: 9.3 - Average Score (79 products) 10 - Best Score (1 products) 8.2 - Worst Score (1 products) We use a special noise measurement tool to test the noise level of the air purifier at all speeds. We measured the noise level on the dBA scale. You can read more about our testing methodology here. | ||
| Best Suited For | Portable Use | Bedrooms Low Energy Cost Small Spaces Portable Use |
| Warranty | 1-year | 3-year |
| In-Depth Review | Fulminare P05 | Blueair Mini Max |
| Price | Check Price on Amazon | Check Price on Amazon |
Performance Test – Comparison
When performing performance tests, we typically test air purifiers in rooms close to their recommended size or slightly larger.
In this case, the Fulminare P05 has a CADR of 135 CFM (230 m³/h), meaning it’s designed to cover rooms up to 215 sq. ft. (20 m²). However, I strongly believe that the manufacturer’s data may not be entirely accurate and that the Fulminare P05 has a much smaller effective coverage area. Because of this, we tested it in two small rooms.
Particle Removal Tests - Comparison
We placed the Fulminare P05 and Blueair Mini Max in two separate tests and measured their performance using the Temtop laser particle meter.
On the other hand, the Blueair Mini Max has a CADR of 60 CFM (102 m³/h), meaning it covers rooms up to 93 sq. ft. (9 m²).
We tested the airborne particle removal performance of these two air purifiers in two identical rooms.
In the first test, performed in a 120 sq. ft. (11 m²) room, we ran both air purifiers at maximum speed for 60 minutes. After that time, the Blueair Mini Max improved air quality by 92%, while the Fulminare P05 improved it by only 69%.
In the second test, in a slightly larger 194 sq. ft. (18 m²) room, the Blueair Mini Max once again delivered far superior results, improving air quality by 89%, while the Fulminare P05 improved it by just 43%.
It is undeniably clear that the Blueair Mini Max is a far more efficient air purifier and a significantly better performer.
Noise Level Test – Comparison
The noise test was straightforward, primarily because both air purifiers have only three fan speeds, making it easier to measure and compare their noise levels.
At the lowest speed, the Fulminare P05 produces 41.1 dBA, while the Blueair Mini Max is slightly quieter at 40.4 dBA.
Noise Levels - Comparison
Comparison of noise levels at all fan speeds between the Fulminare P05 and Blueair Mini Max air purifiers.
However, at maximum speed, the difference is much more noticeable—the Fulminare P05 produces 51.6 dBA, while the Blueair Mini Max is significantly louder at 60.3 dBA.
Based on the data, the Blueair Mini Max is louder than the Fulminare P05, but it’s important to consider that it delivered much better results in the performance test.
| Fan Speed | Fulminare (dBA) | Blueair Mini Max (dBA) |
|---|---|---|
| Speed 1 (Low) | 41.1 dBA | 40.4 dBA |
| Speed 2 (Medium) | 44.8 dBA | 49.5 dBA |
| Speed 3 (High) | 51.6 dBA | 60.3 dBA |
I believe its actual CADR is higher than what Fulminare advertises, so a slightly higher noise level at maximum speed is expected.
Operating Costs – Comparison
Both air purifiers are very energy-efficient. They rank among the lowest-power consumers on the market.
The Fulminare P05 is powered by a 6W motor, while the Blueair Mini Max uses a slightly more powerful 10W motor.
Monthly Power Consumption Cost - Comparison
Comparison of monthly power consumption costs for the Fulminare P05 and Blueair Mini Max air purifiers at all fan speeds.
If you were to run both air purifiers at maximum speed, 24 hours a day, for one month, your electric bill would increase by approximately $0.68 for the Blueair Mini Max and $0.24 for the Fulminare P05.
Apart from electricity costs, there is also the cost of replacement filters, which need to be replaced more frequently for the Fulminare P05.
| Fan Speed | Fulminare (W + $/month) | Blueair Mini Max (W + $/month) |
|---|---|---|
| Standby | 0.2W ($0.02) | 0.2W ($0.02) |
| Speed 1 (Low) | 1.2W ($0.11) | 0.9W ($0.08) |
| Speed 2 (Medium) | 1.6W ($0.14) | 2.7W ($0.24) |
| Speed 3 (High) | 2.7W ($0.24) | 7.7W ($0.68) |
With a longer filter lifespan, more reliable filters, and the availability of third-party filter options, the Blueair Mini Max is slightly more affordable to maintain than the Fulminare P05.
Leave a Reply