In this comparison, I’ll take a detailed look at the Coway AP-1512HH and the Mila air purifier to determine which one is the better buying option.
Both models have some interesting characteristics, smart features, and delivered very good results in our airborne particle removal tests.
However, they are not identical; there are a few huge differences that determine the winner.
Keep reading to find out which of these two, in my opinion, is the better choice.
Our Verdict
Overall, the Coway AP-1512HH performed better in our airborne particle removal tests, is more affordable to maintain, and features a better-optimized motor for quieter operation.
For these reasons, I pick the Coway as the better buying option and the winner of this comparison.
If you have any questions about these two air purifiers, please leave them in the comments section below the article.
Specs: Coway AP-1512HH Vs Mila
| Product Image |  27% off |  |
| Manufacturer | Coway | N/A |
| Model | AP-1512HH | Mila |
| Dimensions (inches / cm) | 16.81 x 9.65 x 18.30 inches (42.7 x 24.5 x 46.5 cm) | 12 x 12 x 15 inches (30.5 x 30.5 x 38.1 cm) |
| Weight (pounds / kg) | 12.8 lb (5.8 kg) | 18 lb (8.2 kg) |
| Clean Air Delivery Rate (CADR) | 233 CFM (396 m³/h) | 245 CFM (416 m³/h) |
| Coverage (4.8 ACH)
Room Coverage Explanation: ACH is a measurement used in indoor air quality management to indicate how many times the air within a defined space is changed/moved through the filter media.
For more details, visit our ACH calculator tool. | 361 sq. ft. (33 m²) | 380 sq. ft. (35 m²) |
| Performance Ratings Performance Ratings Score Summary: 8.3 - Average Score (101 products) 9.9 - Best Score (1 products) 1 - Worst Score (1 products) We use the Temtop LKC-1000S laser particle meter to test the particle removal efficiency of every air purifier. It measures PM2.5 (µg/m3), PM10 (µg/m3), Particles (per/L), and HCHO (mg/m3) in the air, and also calculates the AQI. You can read more about our testing methodology here. | ||
| Filtration Technology | Pre-filter, Deodorization Filter, True HEPA Filter, and Ionizer | HEPA and Activated Carbon Filter (Option) |
| Filter Replacement Indicator | Yes | No |
| Filter Life | up to 12 months | about 6 months |
| Power Consumption
Power Usage Summary: Our extensive testing of 101 air purifiers revealed the following power consumption insights:
Check out our power consumption calculator tool. | 77W | 88W |
| Operating Costs Ratings Operating Costs Ratings Score Summary: 8.9 - Average Score (101 products) 10 - Best Score (2 products) 1.7 - Worst Score (1 products) We measure the power usage at all speeds using an energy meter, after which we calculate how much it would cost to use the device at a particular fan speed for one month. For reference, we use an energy price of $0.12 per kWh. You can read more about our testing methodology here. | ||
| Number of Fan Speeds | 3 – Speed 1, Speed 2, and Speed 3 | 10 – Speed 1, Speed 2, Speed 3, Speed 4, Speed 5, Speed 6, Speed 7, Speed 8, Speed 9, and Speed 10 |
| Air Quality Sensor Air Quality Sensor Summary: Out of 101 air purifiers tested, only 51 have the air quality sensor. | Yes | Yes |
| Air Quality Indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Mode Auto Mode Summary: Out of 101 air purifiers tested, only 52 have auto mode functionality. | Yes | Yes |
| Smart App Smart App Summary: Out of 101 air purifiers tested, only 30 have smart app functionality. | No | Yes |
| Voice Control Voice Control Summary: Out of 101 air purifiers tested, only 29 have voice control functionality. | No | Yes |
| Other Features | IonizerTimer | Carbon Monoxide Detector |
| Noise Level (low – high) | 41.4 – 63.5 dBA | 43.2 - 73.5 dBA |
| Noise Ratings Noise Ratings Score Summary: 9.2 - Average Score (101 products) 10 - Best Score (1 products) 7.6 - Worst Score (1 products) We use a special noise measurement tool to test the noise level of the air purifier at all speeds. We measured the noise level on the dBA scale. You can read more about our testing methodology here. | ||
| Best Suited For | Pets Living Rooms Kitchens Allergies Dust | Living Rooms Offices Dust Air Quality Monitoring |
| Warranty | 3-year | 1-year |
| In-Depth Review | Coway AP-1512HH | Mila |
| Price |
Performance Test – Comparison
Given that these two devices cover almost identical room sizes, we tested them in a 320 sq. ft. (30 m²) room.
During the test, we let both run at their maximum speeds for 60 minutes and measured air quality improvements using a Temtop laser particle meter.
Particle Removal Tests - Comparison
We placed the Coway AP-1512HH and Mila in two separate tests and measured their performance using the Temtop laser particle meter.
The Coway AP-1512HH improved the air quality by 96%, while the Mila achieved a 92% improvement.
These results confirm that the Coway AP-1512HH performs slightly better in our airborne particle removal tests.
Smoke Box Test – Comparison
We placed both devices in our smoke test and measured how quickly they could remove all the smoke from a glass box.
Despite having a slightly lower CADR, the Coway AP-1512HH cleared the smoke faster, taking just 18 seconds.
The Mila air purifier, on the other hand, needed 20 seconds to completely remove the smoke.
However, it’s worth noting that the Mila offers an optional upgraded filter with a significantly higher amount of carbon pellets. With that filter installed, I believe the Mila would likely be more effective than the Coway at neutralizing smoke and odors.
Noise Level Test – Comparison
The Mila is one of the few air purifiers we’ve tested that comes with 10 or more fan speeds.
On the other hand, the Coway AP-1512HH has just 3 fan speeds.
However, despite having so many speed options, the Mila could still be better optimized when it comes to noise.
At the lowest speed, the Mila produces 43.2 dBA, while the Coway AP-1512HH measures 41.4 dBA.
Noise Level Comparison
Comparing the Coway AP-1512HH and Mila noise levels at minimum and maximum speeds.
At maximum speed, the difference is even more noticeable: the Mila reaches 73.5 dBA, whereas the Coway AP-1512HH tops out at 63.5 dBA.
Taking all fan speeds into account, I would say that the Coway AP-1512HH is overall better optimized for noise.
Operating Costs – Comparison
To be frank, these two air purifiers are among the highest power consumers of all the models we’ve tested.
The Mila uses an 88W motor, while the Coway AP-1512HH uses a 77W motor.
If you were to run both air purifiers at maximum speed, 24 hours a day for an entire month, your electricity bill would increase by about $6.61 for the Mila and about $6.05 for the Coway AP-1512HH.
Power Usage Comparison
Comparing the Coway AP-1512HH and Mila power use at minimum and maximum speeds.
In addition to electricity costs, filter replacement costs are also worth considering.
Coway’s replacement filters are significantly more affordable, making the AP-1512HH much cheaper to maintain overall compared to the Mila.
Leave a Reply